![]() His acts might be seen as good or evil, but really he's neither. The same could be said of the Raven King. He's capricious, uncaring, and simply inhuman in the most literal sense. We might say the Gentleman with the Thistledown Hair is evil, but the truth is rather that he's neither good nor evil - he's just different, alien to us and our concept of morality. He transcends those concepts, like the fairies he grew up among. ![]() It's hardly feasible to write everything we know about him in the space of a Stack Exchange answer, but you can read more information about the character at the Strange & Norrell wiki.Īs for whether he's good or bad, I don't think that question really makes sense. Running to more than 1,000 pages, it is set in an alternative version of 19th-century England, where magic. Which name you use might indicate your stance towards him: "the Raven King" is a term of respect, whereas "John Uskglass" makes him sound more normal and mortal. Clarke’s debut, Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell, took her more than 10 years to write. The title of "the Raven King" sounds much more impressive and mystical. John Uskglass is his human name - whether or not it's his real name, the one he was born with, is unknown, but there's nothing special about the name itself unless you know who it is. They're different names/titles for the same person. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |